What distinguishes between a backward society and a modern cosmopolitan? What is the reason for the different existing entities, both starting out the same, but both ending differently? The answer is clear. Modern day experiments in the different disciplines of Science enlighten us, allowing us to improve our daily lives. Furthermore, the dwelling into biochemistry has produced various medical discoveries. Science plays a vital role in society, and to claim that it is a menace is utter rubbish.
Experimental results and findings bring us more information, and with more information come new products which can improve the lives of the world population. Probably an up and coming topic would be nanotechnology. Intrinsically, it involves manipulating miniscule substances, using their latent capabilities to our use. For example, nanotechnology is used to power our current generation of slim and compact hand-phones, as compared to the first generation bulky phones. By shedding light into new topics of interests, we would be able to develop new equipment which would improve our quality of life. Thus, with the steady research in the various departments of science, we would be able to bring about a better world for people to live in. Hence, science benefits civilisation.
Biochemistry has shed light into the realms of medicine. Medicine has probably become categorised as an essential must for everyone now. There was a time once where Tetanus was a sure ticket to the makers. However, cast away those bad memories and marvel at our current medical world now. With a simple injection of a vaccine, Tetanus no longer poses a threat to us humans. Evidently, our crossing into the vast dimensions of the sciences has unlocked bits and bits of information, and by piecing them together, we would be able to utilise our findings into creating a weapon against pathogens. Intrinsically, science brings salvation to humankind.
However, opposition debate that science is a menace, raising the topic that science has brought about weapons of mass destruction. Yes, this is true. Firearms, nuclear and atomic bombs, they are all the products of science. Everyone probably remembers the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the World War 2. Till today, the trails of its destruction are still haunting its descendents. True, science has been a threat to society. However, these incidents only arise when science falls into the wrong hands. Science without conscience is destruction to the soul. Yet, it is clear that the population does not consist purely of heinous malefactors; there are those who intend to use the science for the betterment of mankind. Clearly, the outcome of the usage of science is dependent on the user itself and as such, science is not a menace to civilisation.
Hence, science is not a menace to society, playing a vital role to civilisation itself. Despite this, in retrospect, science is no doubt a menace if used for wrong causes. Yet, by ensuring it does not fall into wrong hands, we are able to prevent horrific calamities from materializing. With this, science is not a menace to society.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment